The Oracle Australia and New Zealand Middleware and Technology Blog.
Showing posts with label Enterprise Content Management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Enterprise Content Management. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

The Perfect ECM Architecture - Part 2

Hopefully you enjoyed Part 1 of this article and had a giggle at the analogy!

How should an organisation execute on their ECM requirements - well, to draw upon a similar analogy you need a vehicle and visit your local showroom. You are shown a real-vehicle, go for a test-drive, negotiate the price and when you get to the delivery day - the vehicle you selected is waiting for you with a full-tank of petrol ready to drive away. All you have to do is tune in your favourite radio stations, put the drivers-seat in the right position and set the mirrors correctly. Buying an ECM solution should be as straight-forward - the solution architecture you get should be like the car you buy from a dealer - the parts come from one manufacturer, have been designed to work together seamlessly from day-1 and all you need to do is configure it to your requirements. There should be no need to bolt the solution together and hope it all works, you shouldn't need to spend time and money with 3rd party suppliers to help you get it running!

We believe that the perfect ECM architecture should look something like this....


So, how should this all work???

The ECM solution should provide the ability to manage ALL of your unstructured information as easily as you manage your structured information. Managing unstructured data across a relational database AND a file-store(s) AND an index is painful, time-consuming and costly. Managing unstructured data WITHIN a relational database is easy, cheap and occurs using the common database management tools and processes you have already developed and deployed for managing structured data. Unstructured data should be stored, managed and protected within the repository and able to be leveraged by other systems including enterprise search using a common set of open-standards tools and APIs.

The ECM platform should be singular in its architecture and approach. You should not have to use different tools and interfaces for managing different types of unstructured data. It should be easy and seamless to create a new HR policy, for example, through MS-WORD (and SharePoint?) review and approve the policy using a template-driven workflow, convert to PDF (or HTML), publish to your portal, intranet or extranet, apply a retention policy appropriate to the document-type and its context and apply digital-rights all through a single solution.

The ability to archive any information from any system should be a component of the ECM solution. A lot of data exists in file and email systems for example. The ability to ingest this data, leaving a 'stub' of metadata is a deliverable that most IT managers will be interested in as it provides back-end benefits. Integrations with ERP and CRM systems to archive data and deliver data is crucial in the improvement of business processes - an example of this is Accounts Payable/Receivable where delivering a digitised image of an invoice, for example, reduces organisational risk and speeds up the payment process. This is driven by image capture, which is ideally also provided as a part of the ECM solution and delivers the ability to acquire (the process that occurs immediately after capture/scanning/eFax-delivery) physical information, tag/categorise/classify, and ingest into the repository.

Underpinning a deployment of Microsoft SharePoint is another area where a complete ECM solution will provide real benefits to an organisation. We all know what SharePoint is good at and most organisations are rapidly becoming aware of its limitations. As a user-interface supporting office-level collaboration SharePoint is great. However, for a larger organisation - its deployability presents some concerns, typically around the number of repositories it can create to support scalability. Providing a true-enterprise repository to support these multiple silos of unstructured data means that common and consistent records and storage policies can be applied and that data can be shared and leveraged by the organisation as a whole.

An organisation may already have tier-2 or tier-3 solutions in place to manage components of ECM such as records or web-content. A complete ECM solution will provide the capability to integrate with these environment to perform one or more of the following functions. Migration, easily support the rapid migration of unstructured information into the enterprise repository enabling the legacy solution to be decommissioned. Federating ECM functionality, such as unified records management, into the legacy repository enabling the application of common and consistent records policies to be applied to unstructured data without the need to migrate information. Leveraging the legacy solution through enterprise search enabling the organisation to find unstructured and structured data through a single search regardless of the repository where data is stored.

Finally, end-user content consumption and interaction through the organisational web-presence environments is becoming a key-focus for businesses around the world. Recent reports have highlighted that in order for a organisation to be successful in the current and projected economic climate, a closer relationship with its customers and partners needs to be established. This occurs in two key ways - publish and interaction.

The first of these, Publish, predominately supports the Internet or any other web-presence where content-consumption is the lead requirement. Content is created and managed within the ECM solution and then, as a part of its lifecycle, published to a website. End-users access the site and either navigate or search for information and land at the published content. In order for this to be successful and for the organisation NOT to end up with a management overhead because they selected a separate app-server/portal-server and ECM solution from different vendors - the ideal solution is to have a single solution in place. This enables the website and the ECM solution to be integrated in such a way that management and administation occurs once. New content, with potentially new categorisation resulting in a change to naviagation, is created, managed and published and ALL changes required around the content occur naturally and automatically. New classification results in the navigation hierarchy being modified - the user, or administrator, does NOT need to create a new 'node' on the menu manually.

The second, interaction, enables multi-directional web-based communication between an organisation and its customers and partners. Recent developments in web-technologies resulting in the adoption of Web2.0 and the popularity of social-networking sites such as FaceBook and mySpace have raised questions with organisations around how this can be of real-benefit to the business. Qualification has taken place around the investments required to return value to the business and organisation like Oracle have invested in initiatives like SocialCRM and its Enterprise 2.0 offerings. The interactive environment will allow employees, customers and partners to consume and contribute information within an easy-to-use (i.e. minimal training required) environment and is totally integrated with the ECM solution. Information from varying systems should be accessible through this single environment - allowing the mashing together of data, e.g. from the ERP, CRM and ECM environment to provide better context around information and participation within the creation and review process.

All of this functionality and capability is available from a handful of tier-1 ECM vendors including Oracle. Tier-2 and tier-3 ECM vendors can offer part of the overall ECM requirement but do so through an imperfect architecture - often requiring multiple UI's or repositories to be deployed or compromising on functionality or capability in some way.

I look forward to reading your questions and comments about this article - I'm sure it will raise many amongst our readership.

Paul

Greening the Data-Centre - the ECM Way

Greening the data-centre is an initiative that any responsible environmentally-aware organisation should be undertaking.

Simply virtualisation at the server-level goes along way to achieving your goals - but so does switching off monitors, ceiling-lights and other items of electrical equipment that are on your desks right now!

One of the major challenges that is faced by an organisation is actually around the amount of information spread across multiple systems and held in numerous versions or simple duplication of data. Within an organisation, 85% of information is comprised of unstructured data and of this - a high percentage (30-40% in some cases) is duplicated. Implementing an ECM solution properly, that promotes single-point-storage for unstructured data is a key deliverable in greening the data-centre. Managing a smaller data footprint on fewer servers delivers environmental benefits as well as reducing overall costs in real-dollar terms.

Paul

Friday, May 2, 2008

WEB 2.0 for the Enterprise Technology Day

We have just completed the first Oracle Technology days for WEB 2.0 and the Enterprise. Attendance was quiet strong and from the feedback we have a lot of people wanting to know more about how to commence the journey of WEB 2.0 in the Enterprise.

A unique feature of these two events in Sydney and Melbourne was that Oracle utilised partners that are domain experts to deliver the content around Portal, SOA integration, Security for Mashups and Content Management for WEB 2.0.

Attached are the presentations from the events. If you would like to know more information please contact me or the relevant partner. Shortly we will publish the podcast that correspond to each presentation and also details of the follow up workshops. The workshops will allow each of you to get a hands on feel for how to integrated the various components of Fusion Middleware into existing corporate applications to gain WEB 2.0 experiences.

At the end of the 4 sessions we had a preview of Oracle's Social CRM or Seibel On Demand V15. Some WEB 2.0 features of this product i can see as offering real usability and productivity advantages to sales teams or anyone that is involved with customers. These features included integrated Instant Message IM, ability to leverage public API's from social sites liked linkedin to see how you can link to someone, for instance imaging if you need to contact a CFO within an account. You may now his/her name but that's it, if your sponsor doesn't have access what do you do? Well with these API's like linked in you could simply click a button within your CRM and the magic of WEB2.0 would occur. The result could be a list of people you know who can introduce you through their contacts to the CFO. We all know an introduction will be more successful than any form of cold call or unannounced introduction. Another feature is the ability to maintain customers contact information by leveraging their details with consent of course from these sites. Another feature was the ability to integrate portlets or widgets of CRM functionality into external portal sites such as iGoogle. All of this functionality is possible in your current CRM systems by leveraging the solution sets in Fusion Middleware.

Presentations
Session 1 Oracle Portal Usability and Accessibility for WEB 2.0 Applications by Allan Jansen - UberConsult




Session 2 Enabling Enterprise Integration for WEB 2.0 Applications by Jerry Gaines - Intelligent Pathways





Session 3 Enabling and Securing WEB 2.0 Applications by Antony Krilis - Agreon





Session 4 Content Management for WEB 2.0 by Phil Hoppe - Astral


Enjoy the presentations and thank you for attending.



Carl Terrantroy

Friday, February 22, 2008

Enterprise Content Management in 2008 and beyond...

It's been an interesting few years for ECM vendors around the globe, with numerous acquisitions and mergers taking place. We are seeing a great deal of consolidation in the market and this is surely only providing benefits to our customers - or is it?

The requirement for an organisation to store and manage structured (DB), unstructured (docs etc.) and semi-structured (xml) increases on a daily basis. Current estimates state that around 84% of information lives outside of the database - and this drives interest within an organisation like Oracle to get their ECM pitch right (which, incidentally, we have done).

John Batelle once wrote that "every day, we create and store more information (in the digital format) than has been stored for most of human history on paper". John was quoted in his book "the Search, How Google and its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Our Culture" - it is an interesting fact that electronic information is having such an impact on our lives and the IT industry as a whole. Historically, IT was more interested in providing the applications for the end-users - NOW, IT is more interested in working out how to store and manage all the information coming from these applications, and from a wide-diversity of other sources.

I presented a road-show around APAC during the middle-latter part of 2007 during which I spoke about changes I had experienced in my career. The topic that generated the most interest concerned the cost models of storing information in the mid-80's to today. Historically, storing paper in a warehouse was cheap whilst storing information digitally was expensive. I worked for the biggest consumer of on-line storage outside of government and IBM in the UK and we had the grand total of 128Mb of online available storage - held on drives that resembled a top-loading washing machine. I have more storage and computing power on my Blackberry in 2008!

Today, of course, on-line storage is dirt-cheap (one reason why EMC, IBM, HDS etc. are looking to add value through software acquisition and development) whilst warehousing paper is incredibly expensive and frowned upon by the tree-huggers. The costs involved in managing paper (retention, disposition etc.) are staggering and with the rise in demand for storage - only going to get higher and higher.

An interesting statistic, driven out of a published report sponsored by EMC is that by 2010, the demand for storage will outstrip availability/manufacturing at today's levels. This means that unless information management is addressed through intelligent systems such as ECM - manufacturing is going to have to step-up meaning a further drain on the world's resources. Storing information more intelligently means a reducing in duplication of information, appropriate retention and disposition based upon the information's lifecycle, virtualisation resulting in fewer physical servers using less air-con and power etc. etc. etc. We are a brighter, greener Oracle nowadays - the latest database requires less disk-space, half the power, half the cost and it runs faster with much more capability than ever before.

So what are Paul's predictions for the future.

Well, firstly I believe that ECM as a strategy within a customer's environment will move towards an implementation as a part of the data-centre infrastructure. Customers are looking for a unified content management (UCM) platform that truly allows any content from any source to be stored, protected and leveraged by the larger community. Realistically, as of February 2008, there are only 3 vendors in the marketplace that can truly provide this and Oracle is unique in its approach and software-focussed strategy. Our customers are not getting the hardware (storage and server) pitches that our two main competitors will drive - shifting physical boxes being their primary business.

Secondly, I think that we will see more acquisitions and/or mergers happening during 2008-2009. There are a number of tier-2 players in the ECM space that are ripe for acquisition and there are a number of hardware vendors that might look to expand their footprint within their own customer base through new initiatives around ECM and the intelligence these products bring to the storage or server environments. Tower, Vignette, Interwoven et al. fit firmly into this arena - potential suitors may include HP, Dell or Sun.

Thirdly, Open-Source ECM vendors like Alfresco are starting to gain significant presence in the marketplace. I had the pleasure of working with John Newton and the Alfresco team whilst I was based in the UK with Documentum and the guys really are the nicest people in the world with great vision and execution. This is demonstrated if you ever get the chance to meet the team and/or see the software in action. Organisations remain wary of open-source initiatives but I believe that the next 2 years will tell for product like Alfresco. With all of the consolidation happening in the industry, we here at Oracle welcome new and upcoming competition - particulary when driven by industry legends such as John and his team.

Finally, everybody has to consider the big M. Microsoft are making inroads into the ECM space through Sharepoint and other similar products in their line-up. It's interesting to still hear customers talk about Sharepoint enthusiastically - only to bow out of conversations when you raise ECM functionality outside of document collaboration. I am sure that M is working hard on developing their products to become truly competitive, tier-2 and 3 ECM vendors will suffer first and we may see some disappear. I am pretty sure that M will join us as a tier-1 vendor in the next couple of years - assuming their developers and product managers don't get moved onto the next big thing before then (what ever happened to Microsoft's HRMS, ERP and CRM initiatives anyhow?)

Roll-on 2010

Paul

3 weeks in and .........




It's been a grand total of 3 weeks since I joined Oracle from EMC - and already it feels like I've been here forever (in a good way of course!).

Oracle is a very interesting place to work, prior to EMC I worked for Documentum in the UK and there are so many similarities between Documentum and Oracle and so many differences between Oracle and EMC. Documentum, like Oracle, was a west-coast based software company that was an incredible amount of fun to work for. Annual kick-off events were always a showcase for our innovation as well as excellent opportunities to meet and network with colleagues from around the world. Software was the clear focus for the organisation and we had a flexible approach to sales and marketing that meant that we would adapt to rapidly changing market drivers. EMC is an east-coast storage giant, that happens to have moved into the software market through acquisitions of companies like Documentum and Legato amongst others. The first 18 months following acquisition were ok, but things changed and the changes made were drivers for my decision to look at the industry and see what I wanted to do next. I would guess that my story from EMC is similar in context to a lot of the Oracle employees who have joined this organisation through acquisition. The big difference here between EMC and Oracle is that we are a top-to-bottom software organisation that is well versed in acquiring organisations and assimilating technology. My advise, be patient and things will work themselves out.

Anyway, I was approached by Oracle with an offer to join and assume a new role within the GTMi (Go to market initiatives) team working for Carl Terrantroy. I joined on the 1st February 2008 and the last 3 weeks have been nothing short of enjoyable and interesting. I've met so may people who have had so many good things to say about the organisation. The products we develop and sell are second-to-none, my specialty is Enterprise Content Management (ECM) and we are certainly one of the leaders in the space from a number of perspectives - backing up the research undertaken by Gartner, Forrester et al.

My focus is content which encompasses Enterprise Content Management and Collaboration to name but a few initiatives. I will be driving campaigns within the ANZ region around these areas, working with marketing, channels, partners as well as the ECM team themselves.

You can find me on level 6 at North Ryde, stop by and say hello.

Paul